Device safety assessment of bronchoscopic microwave ablation of normal swine peripheral lung using robotic-assisted bronchoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the safety of bronchoscopic microwave ablation (MWA) of peripheral lung parenchyma using the NEUWAVE™ FLEX Microwave Ablation System, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) using the MONARCH™ Platform in a swine model. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT)-guided RAB MWA was performed in the peripheral lung parenchyma of 17 Yorkshire swine (40-50 kg) and procedural adverse events (AEs) documented. The acute group (day 0, n = 5) received 4 MWAs at 100 W for 1, 3, 5, and 10 min in 4 different lung lobes. Subacute and chronic groups (days 3 and 30, n = 6 each) received one MWA (100 W, 10 min) per animal. RESULTS: The study was completed without major procedural complications. No postprocedural AEs including death, pneumothorax, bronchopleural fistula, hemothorax, or pleural effusions were observed. No gross or histological findings suggestive of thromboembolism were found in any organ. One 3-Day and one 30-Day swine exhibited coughing that required no medication (minor AEs), and one 30-Day animal required antibiotic medication (major AE) for a suspected lower respiratory tract infection that subsided after two weeks. CT-based volumetric estimates of ablation zones in the acute group increased in an ablation time-dependent (1-10 min) manner, whereas macroscopy-based estimates showed an increasing trend in ablation zone size. CONCLUSION: The NEUWAVE FLEX and MONARCH devices were safely used to perform single or multiple RAB MWAs. The preclinical procedural safety profile of RAB MWA supports clinical research of both devices to investigate efficacy in select patients with oligometastatic disease or primary NSCLC.

The economic significance of orthopaedic infections.

Musculoskeletal infections are a leading cause of patient morbidity and rising healthcare expenditures. The incidence of musculoskeletal infections, including soft-tissue infections, periprosthetic joint infection, and osteomyelitis, is increasing. Cases involving both drug-resistant bacterial strains and periprosthetic joint infection in total hip and total knee arthroplasty are particularly costly and represent a growing economic burden for the American healthcare system. With the institution of the Affordable Care Act, there has been an increasing drive in the United States toward rewarding healthcare organizations for their quality of care, bundling episodes of care, and capitating approaches to managing populations. In current reimbursement models, complications following the index event, including infection, are not typically reimbursed, placing the burden of caring for infections on the physician, hospital, or accountable care organization. Without the ability to risk-stratify patient outcomes based on patient comorbidities that are associated with a higher incidence of musculoskeletal infection, healthcare organizations are disincentivized to care for moderate- to high-risk patients. Reducing the cost of treating musculoskeletal infection also depends on incentivizing innovations in infection prevention.